HOW TO STUDY REFERENCE
BOOKS
(Source: Eugene P. Sheehy, Guide to Reference Books,
p. xiv-xv).
"Only
constant and practical use of a reference book will make a student thoroughly
familiar with its character and use, but the following suggestions will help
him [or her] in his [or her] preliminary examination of the book.
1.
Examine title page carefully for information as to:
a) scope of work as indicated in
title
b) author's name
c) author's previous record (often indicated by list of degrees,
positions, titles of earlier works, etc.)
d) publisher
e) date of publication. Check date or
publication by reference to copyright date and date of preface while these dates offer no
absolute guarantee of the date of information in the book, they sometimes help
in determining this, especially in cases where they are considerably earlier
than the imprint date.
2.
Read Preface or Introduction for
a) further information as to scope of
work
b) special
features claimed
c) limitations,
if any
d) comparison with other books on
same subject.
3.
Examine book itself for
a) arrangement
b) kind of entry
c) Cross references, i.e., extent to which included, whether
given in main work or in separate list, etc.
d) supplementary lists, noting number and kind and bow
connected with main work
e) indexes, noting fullness and exactness of reference
f) quality and kind of articles, noting whether they are
popular or scientific, signed or unsigned impartial or biased and especially
whether they are equipped with satisfactory bibliographical references in the
form or either appended bibliographies, references throughout the text or
bibliographical footnotes. Several articles should be read carefully. compared
with similar articles in other books‑ The student should, if possible,
look up some subjects upon which he [or she] has either some special knowledge
or means of securing accurate information.
However important the form and convenience of arrangement of a
reference book may be, the trustworthiness of its information is of still greater
importance‑ and a knowledge of its comparative accuracy or inaccuracy is
fundamental to any real knowledge of the book‑
4.
In examining both Preface and articles, note any evidence of lack of
impartiality; e.g., if the book deals with a controversial subject, religious,
political, etc., does it represent only one side; or, in the case of a
biographical work, are the selection of names, kind and length of article,
etc., determined in any way by the desire to secure subscribers.
5. In studying the arrangement of a book, note
the possibility of variation in books which follow the same general
arrangement; e.g., in a work arranged alphabetically, note what rules for
alphabetizing have been followed. Among
encyclopedias, for example, the Britannica and the
6.
If the work in question
purports care to be a new edition, note carefully the extent of revision
claimed for it and check this by comparison with earlier editions. New or revised editions often present very
special difficulties, and the examination should be extended enough to
determine whether the revision is
a)
so complete and
thorough that it supersedes the earlier work
b) thorough, but with the omission of some of
some material included in the earlier work which is still useful, in which case
the two editions may have to be used together, or
c)
so insufficient and superficial that the earlier edition is still to be
preferred.
A
reference worker needs such information about a book for two purposes:
a)
to decide whether or
not the book should be purchased
b)
to be able to explain
to readers who ask for a so-called new edition why its purchase was considered
advisable."