|
|
Practice,
|
||||||
| About |
|||||||
|
praXis? Program Synopsis National Impact xxx |
Why
the name PRAXIS - Practice, Reflection, Advocacy,
eXcellence, Inquiry, Solutions : Critical pedagogist Paulo Freire defines praxis as "...reflection and action upon the world in order to transform it" (cited from Hendriks, Sarah. Review of Freire, Paulo (1998/1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, translated by Myra Bergman. New York: Continuum. http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/~daniel_schugurensky/freire/sh2.html, viewed 1/28/02). The proposed program is named PRAXIS because it will enable professional librarians to come from practice, reflect on critical issues in LIS and their community, create a research agenda with a focus on advocacy, engage in an environment that will assist them to eXcel as professionals and develop skills in critical inquiry in order to develop solutions to transform information services and education in a multicultural society. Description of Project Goals and Major Activities PRAXIS is pre-doctoral and recruitment program (2002-03) that responds to the following five professional issues:
The cornerstone of this project is that Program PRAXIS will train eight professional librarians in research, information technology and policy as well as prepare them to undertake doctoral studies. It builds on the Department's diversity recruitment and mentoring initiatives, whereby we have identified a pool of potential applicants. Program PRAXIS has two main goals: (1) to increase the number of librarians of culturally diverse backgrounds with advanced professional training, and (2) to increase the number of librarians of culturally diverse backgrounds with readiness to undertake doctoral studies. Participants of this 9-month (with only a 6-month residency) post-MLIS certificate will receive a scholarship covering tuition/fees and a stipend, and will:
PRAXIS has long-range and far-reaching impact for the profession's capacity for diversifying the faculty, research and leadership in information studies. The involvement of culturally diverse and non-ethnic IS and non-IS faculty locally and nationally, practicing professionals, and doctoral students in the implementation of Program PRAXIS will serve as a model of diverse stakeholders in recruiting, teaching, mentoring, and retaining post-MLIS students of culturally diverse backgrounds who will continue into doctoral studies or will engage in praxis as professionals. Eighteen other advanced certificate programs have been identified across the country that would be able to replicate this Program. Program PRAXIS graduates will be leaders and/or faculty engaged in conducting research and providing information access in a culturally diverse, technologically-complex, and information-intensive 21st Century world as well as recruiters for tomorrow's culturally diverse faculty. Professional Issues As we embark on a new century, our nation is increasingly becoming more diverse and more technology-driven, and the globalized economy threatens to widen the division between rich and poor. We need a diverse library and information workforce to address the information needs arising out of this complex and rapidly changing environment. (see http://www.ala.org/congress/recommendations.html) The American Library Association, other library and information associations, professionals, and educators are addressing the recruitment of Master's students of culturally diverse backgrounds. At the UCLA Department of Information Studies (IS), our Diversity Recruitment and Mentoring Committee (DRMC; http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/drmc) has been engaged in increasing the number of culturally diverse students admitted, and graduating from the Information Studies program. However, two areas that have not been sufficiently addressed are the lack of diversity of the library and information studies (LIS) faculty and insufficient advanced training for librarians of culturally diverse backgrounds in such things as policy analysis, technology, research and publishing. An examination of current library issues described below substantiates this conclusion. [NOTE: The term “librarian” will be used to broadly to refer to library, archives and information professionals.] 1. Shortage of LIS faculty from culturally diverse backgrounds
The American Library Association recognizes the value of cultural diversity, and that not only are librarians responsible for addressing the information needs of a multicultural society but that librarians should reflect this diversity and receive a professional education made up of a culturally diverse curriculum and faculty. According to the findings in the Library and Information Science Education Statistical Report 2000 (edited by Evelyn H. Daniel and Jerry D. Saye. Association for Library and Information Science Educators. http://ils.unc.edu/ALISE/2000/Contents.htm), ALA-accredited programs offering doctoral degrees reported only 7.8 percent of doctoral students in Fall 1999 represented non-White ethnic groups. This percentage falls short of the 28.1% national population estimate for non-White ethnic groups for the same year. http://quickfacts.census.gov/cgi-bin/usa Furthermore, research has shown that the LIS curriculum lacks multicultural content (Josey, E..J. "Education for Library Services to Cultural Minorities," Education Libraries, 15: 20, Winter 1991; Chu, Clara M. "Education for Multicultural Librarianship," In: Multiculturalism in Libraries, by Ruhig Du Mont, Rosemary et al. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1994; pp. 127-56.), thus, many librarians do not have adequate training to provide effective information services in culturally diverse communities. 2. Graying of the LIS faculty and unfilled positions The Library and Information Science Education Statistical Report 2001 (edited by Evelyn H. Daniel and Jerry D. Saye. Association for Library and Information Science Educators. http://ils.unc.edu/ALISE/2001/Contents.htm), reports data that show that by the year 2005 fifteen percent of LIS faculty will be 65 years of age or older, thus, ready to retire, and another 21% will be 60-64 years of age and eligible to retire (Table I-18. Age Categories of Full-Time Faculty , http://ils.unc.edu/ALISE/2001/faculty/Table%20I-18.htm). Furthermore, during the 1900-2000 year, 49 positions were vacant despite the availability of funding for the positions (Table I-47-a). The call for more Ph.D. graduates to fill these positions cannot go unheeded. 3. Lack of continuing education opportunities in such areas as research, and information policy and technologies
The need for continuing education is not only an ALA Action area but one of the six recommendations resulting from the Congress on Professional Education: Focus on Education for the First Professional Degree, held April 30-May 1, 1999, by ALA http://www.ala.org/congress/recommendations.html. This call to "Enable Credentialing and Continuing Education" was considered so critical that the 2nd Congress on Professional Education, held November 17-19, 2000, focused on Continuing Professional Development http://www.ala.org/congress/2nd_congress/, viewed 1/28/02. 4. Call for leaders to shape information policy Librarians must be informed and articulate about information policy issues in order to protect the public's right to information. To do this effectively, it is critical for librarians to be knowledgeable of national information policy, the players and stakeholders, the impact and implications for communities and individuals, and how to represent the public interest and influence policy development. Many information policy issues face our communities today; information literacy, freedom of expression, the digital divide and information access are a few. 5. Lack of empirical, critical and theoretical inquiry in multicultural library and information practice Although the published literature in multicultural library and information studies (MCLIS) is increasing, it is deficient in both quality and quantity. Excluding a few research studies, the literature can be classed into two categories: description or prescription. Carlson et al (1990) also found that few publications are analytical or theoretical in nature. If they don't describe a service, recount a history of multicultural services or relate problems or issues, they are resource lists, bibliographies, policies or guidelines for developing multicultural services. Few articles were found which discuss foundations for multicultural information services. Therefore, much research of an empirical, theoretical and critical nature still needs to be conducted and published. Since research methods is not a required course in many library and information science programs, many librarians do not have such skills. Program PRAXIS has been designed both to address the national library concerns described above and to respond to the four emphases of the IMLS Education and Training Program. When examined side-by-side, the emphases and issues are complementary.
This Program has long-range and far-reaching impact for the profession’s
capacity for diversifying the research, faculty and leadership in information
studies. Program PRAXIS graduates will be leaders and/or faculty engaged
in conducting research and providing information access in a culturally
diverse, technologically-complex, and information-intensive 21st Century
world as well as recruiters for tomorrow's culturally diverse faculty. 1. The Program will recruit eight MLIS librarians of culturally diverse
backgrounds into a pre-doctoral program.
2. PRAXIS students of this 9-month (with only a 6-month residency) post-MLIS certificate program will:
As a result of engaging in praxis and developing the above tangible products, Program PRAXIS students will learn from the perspectives of other fields while their training and mentoring will be grounded in library and information science; refine their writing, communication and presentation skills; disseminate their research; and engage in an intellectually-rich and challenging advanced graduate environment that, hopefully, will lead to a Ph.D. |
||||||